Combat damage assessment team
Read Online
Share

Combat damage assessment team A-10/GAU-8 low angle firings versus simulated Soviet tank company (array 21) Aerojet lot number AJD 79A181-001 (30 October 1979) by R. H. S. Stolfi

  • 548 Want to read
  • ·
  • 9 Currently reading

Published by Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • United States,
  • Weapons systems,
  • Ammunition,
  • United States. Marine Corps,
  • Aerial gunnery,
  • Testing,
  • Tanks (Military science),
  • A-10 (Jet attack plane)

Book details:

About the Edition

This report describes firings of the A-10/GAU-8 weapon system on 30 October 1979 against a Soviet tank company simulated by 10 combat loaded M-47 tanks. The pilots making the firing passes attacked at low altitude and used correspondingly low dive angles in order to simulate movement through a hostile air defense system. Ammunition used in the attacks comprised 30mm armor piercing incendiary (API) rounds, which proved Aerojet Lot Number AJD 79A181-001 to be effective damage agents against substantial areas of the U.S. MK 47 tanks used as targets. The pilots in nine successful firing passes (one pilot missed his intended target) fired a total of 289 rounds of which 98 impacted the targets. Of the projectiles impacting on targets, 22 achieved perforations of the armored envelope. Significant results include 3 tanks immobilized, of which 2 tanks were also silenced and six others damaged. (Author)

Edition Notes

Other titlesA-10/GAU-8 low angle firings versus simulated Soviet tank company (array 21) Aerojet lot number AJD 79A181-001 (30 October 1979)
StatementR.H.S. Stolfi, R.R. McEachin ; prepared for A-10 System Program Office
ContributionsMcEachin, R. R., United States. Air Force. A-10 System Program Office, Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
The Physical Object
Paginationv, 43 p. :
Number of Pages43
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL25515316M
OCLC/WorldCa34749850

Download Combat damage assessment team

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Bomb damage assessment (BDA), also known as battle damage assessment, is the practice of assessing damage inflicted on a target from a stand-off weapon, most typically a bomb or air launched is part of the larger discipline of combat ment is performed using many techniques including footage from in-weapon cameras, gun cameras, forces on the ground near the . damage that they bring could be disruptive to daily operations or could incur heavy losses to the business. To minimise the disruption that disasters might present to the business, there is a need to have an effective process for damage assessment and salvage. The damage assessment team (DA T). Mobile Training Team - MTT Request form for Organizations Reference Material List CJCSI C, No Strike Collateral Damage Method Limited .mil/.gov only) CJSCI , Methodology for Combat Assessment CJCSI C, Target Development Standards Limited .mil/.gov only) CJSCI C, Target Coordinate Mensuration Certification and. Damage Assessment Team (DAT) – Duties and Responsibilities Damage Assessment Teams should include contingency planners, security personnel, building engineers, branch managers, custodians, and representatives from critical function areas within the credit union and building owners. Their first responsibility willFile Size: 19KB.

Battle Damage Assessment: BDA - Kindle edition by Parker, Brian, Dewater, Aurora. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Battle Damage Assessment: BDA/5(20). Recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) are subsets of maintenance. Both are the owning units’ responsibilities; both have a fundamental purpose of returning combat assets to the battlefield as soon as possible. Joint Combat Assessment Team • Provided a Rapid Response to a Critical Need During OIF • Provide embedded threat assessment support to the aviation warfighter ¾Collaborate with operations and intelligence organizations to provide empirical combat damage data in support of decision making processes (ie: TTP’s, intelligence assessments). viii Commander’s Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution recommendations to account for discrepancies between the actual and predicted progress. Commanders then compare the assessment against their vision and intent and adjust operations to ensure objectives are met and the military end state is achieved. There are threeFile Size: 2MB.

A physical damage assessment is an estimate of the extent of physical damage to a target based upon observed or interpreted damage. This post- attack target anal-ysis should be a coordinated effort among combat units, component commands, the JTF, the combat-ant command, and national agencies. Combat assessment is composed of three major components: battle damage assessment (BDA) munitions effects assessment; reattack recommendation. The GS-3 is normally the single point of contact for combat assessment at the joint force level, assisted by the joint force GS The Clark County Damage Assessment Team (DAT) is a network of Building Safety staff and volunteers that evaluate the structural safety of residential and commercial buildings in the event of emergencies or natural disasters. Local residents with building inspection, construction, design, or engineering backgrounds are invited to sign up as DAT volunteers. How is Combat Damage Repair Assessment Team abbreviated? CDRAT stands for Combat Damage Repair Assessment Team. CDRAT is defined as Combat Damage Repair Assessment Team very rarely.